PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 6.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP EliteBook 840 G1 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 198F |
Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190829 |
Uptime | 1.6 Days |
Run Date | Jan 21 '20 at 01:29 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-4600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
60.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon HD 8750M
HP(103C 1990) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
|
6.12%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 308 308 307 310 308 MB/s
|
116%
Outstanding
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
54GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 38 29 30 30 MB/s
|
29.8%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
56.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4300UIntelBench 44%, 36,631 samples | 163x |
Core i7-4600UIntelBench 49%, 26,548 samples | 70x |
Core i5-4200UIntel $281Bench 43%, 64,450 samples | 49x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples | 319x |
Radeon HD 8750MAMDBench 6%, 409 samples | 4x |
Radeon HD 8500M/8700MAMDBench 6%, 604 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 4% - Terrible | Total price: $209 |