Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '20 at 00:17
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370-$175 34,720 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 94.7 1-Core 76.6 2-Core 138 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 461 44% 362 Pts	64-Core 459 28% 459 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1757 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Lighting 48.3 Reflection 34.1 Parallax 41.4 39% 41.3 fps	MRender 39 Gravity 45.8 Splatting 40.1 34% 41.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LM480HMHQ-000 480GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: GXT5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 186 249 251 254 254 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 362 Write 313 Mixed 267 SusWrite 232 66% 293 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 35.5 119% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 190 137% 178 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 106%
Samsung MZ7LM480HMHQ-00005 480GB 303 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 205GB free Firmware: GXT5204Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 196 197 200 201 200 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 393 Write 380 Mixed 292 SusWrite 194 71% 315 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 34.4 116% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 29.4 DQ Write 89.7 DQ Mixed 42 37% 53.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 115%
Samsung MZ7LM480HMHQ-00005 480GB 303 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 136GB free Firmware: GXT5204Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 368 374 383 384 384 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Read 396 Write 387 Mixed 296 SusWrite 367 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 63.9 4K Mixed 35.5 120% 42 MB/s	DQ Read 30 DQ Write 93.4 DQ Mixed 42.8 38% 55.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 115%
Samsung MZ7LM480HMHQ-00005 480GB 303 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 311GB free Firmware: GXT5204Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 196 197 200 201 201 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 396 Write 381 Mixed 297 SusWrite 194 71% 317 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 34.3 115% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 29.5 DQ Write 90 DQ Mixed 41.8 37% 53.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 247GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 127 125 131 130 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 126 Write 75.8 Mixed 69.6 SusWrite 127 73% 99.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Vulcan-2133 2x4GB 609 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	51.7% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 17.3 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 13.4 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 57.9 69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16