PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 39.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MICRO-STAR MS-7576 |
Motherboard | MSI 790GX-G65 (MS-7576) (all builds) |
Memory | 8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110221 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jan 20 '20 at 20:57 |
Run Duration | 192 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 74% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
45.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.1
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 73 73 72 71 MB/s
|
28.7%
Poor
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
343GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 74 73 72 71 MB/s
|
42.9%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 132 139 131 122 120 MB/s
|
76%
Very good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
287GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 134 139 130 121 120 MB/s
|
75.6%
Very good
|
|||
PI-239 USB 2.0 Drive 1TB
196GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 24 24 24 MB/s
|
14%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM SDRAM
|
27.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 6x |
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 2x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples | 2x |
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples | 2x |
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 24% - Poor | Total price: $518 |