Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory55.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '20 at 20:54
Run Duration613 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 79.2
1-Core 139
2-Core 277
89% 165 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 1,058
96% 806 Pts
64-Core 2,071
128% 2,071 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Gigabyte(1458 362C) 3GB
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Lighting 73.9
Reflection 72.3
Parallax 98.1
60% 81.4 fps
MRender 84.5
Gravity 82
Splatting 55.6
59% 74 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 59%
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Lighting 71.4
Reflection 72.9
Parallax 65.1
58% 69.8 fps
MRender 74.8
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 62
55% 68 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,520
Write 2,365
Mixed 1,658
485% 2,181 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 85.4
285% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,201
DQ Write 1,062
DQ Mixed 1,131
848% 1,131 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
19GB free
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 426
Write 346
Mixed 330
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 39.7
138% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 124
100% 140 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 105%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 148 149 147 149 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 135
Write 104
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 148
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 99%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
227GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 38
Write 22.3
Mixed 31
SusWrite 35.8
42% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 38%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
101GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 31 31 32 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 18.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 31.5
38% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 39.6
115% 40.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 35.6
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,265
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback