| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H61M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140721 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 20 '20 at 19:50 |
| Run Duration | 164 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
79.2%
Very good
|
75% 128 Pts
|
51% 379 Pts
|
24% 380 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
18.2%
Very poor
|
18% 20.4 fps
|
18% 22.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 87 17 42 17 90 MB/s
|
40.6%
Average
|
23% 104 MB/s
|
84% 30.7 MB/s
|
79% 119 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
298GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 124 132 131 145 126 MB/s
|
72.2%
Very good
|
77% 105 MB/s
|
117% 0.9 MB/s
| |
|
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 14 9 18 13 11 MB/s
|
11.3%
Very poor
|
20% 17.2 MB/s
|
99% 2.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
59.5%
Above average
|
59% 20.7 GB/s
|
48% 16.8 GB/s
|
64% 62 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,321 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 332x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 265x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 188x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 441x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 146x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 112x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $227 |