Asus M5A88-V EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A88-V EVO (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130416
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '20 at 18:24
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370E-$471 5,639 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 87.8 1-Core 64.2 2-Core 131 59% 94.3 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 406 40% 328 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 0517) CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.2 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Lighting 66 Reflection 63.4 Parallax 87.5 54% 72.3 fps	MRender 70.4 Gravity 73.6 Splatting 57.4 54% 67.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 209 222 240 251 261 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 347 Write 334 Mixed 313 SusWrite 234 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 38.2 124% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 40.2 DQ Write 76.2 DQ Mixed 51 41% 55.8 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 128%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 240GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 93 95 93 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 91.3 Write 91.8 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 93.3 61% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 60%
WD WD1600AVJB-63SZA 160GB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 149GB free Firmware: 58.01H58 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 35 37 36 36 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Read 66 Write 34 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 35.6 32% 43 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 42%
WD My Passport Essential 320GB 787 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 297GB free, PID 070a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 39 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 39.2 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 39.1 48% 35.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 20%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 984GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 25 Write 17.5 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 17.5 26% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.4 2.7 2.6 2.9 2.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	4.3% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 9 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 2.6 10% 8.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.3% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.1% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 14.4 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 10.9 25% 8.67 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A88-V EVO Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A88-V EVO

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	13x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	11x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	27x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	22x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16