PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Asus CG8270 (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK CG8270 |
Memory | 0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121225 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 20 '20 at 14:23 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
46.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Asus(1043 8540) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 112 106 110 104 MB/s
|
39.8%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
884GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 119 118 118 118 MB/s
|
66.7%
Good
|
|||
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 74 70 65 67 MB/s
|
36.9%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNHC 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
20.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 227x |
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples | 18x |
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 36x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 29x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 16x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $567 |