Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Memory 46.5 1-Core 35.4 2-Core 93.8 34% 58.6 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 178 24% 180 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 16A0) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	2.4% Terrible	Lighting 2.83 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 3.28 2% 2.94 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 3.47 Splatting 2.96 3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.4% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB 6,868 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MA020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 159 164 162 175 186 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.9% Below average	Read 205 Write 192 Mixed 146 SusWrite 164 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 48.1 4K Mixed 11.6 53% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 15.9 DQ Write 62.1 DQ Mixed 22.6 22% 33.5 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 8.8 26% 8.97 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	184x
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	181x
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	34x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	205x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	164x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	17x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16