| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130410 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 20 '20 at 13:15 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 51% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
67.8%
Good
|
60% 93.9 Pts
|
37% 286 Pts
|
20% 324 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
|
58.4%
Above average
|
59% 70.3 fps
|
56% 69 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 303 280 262 186 181 MB/s
|
92.4%
Outstanding
|
83% 371 MB/s
|
150% 51.2 MB/s
|
195% 261 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
266GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 127 138 137 137 MB/s
|
77.3%
Very good
|
75% 104 MB/s
|
150% 1.17 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
397GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 154 158 157 157 MB/s
|
76.7%
Very good
|
81% 110 MB/s
|
224% 1.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
|
47.4%
Average
|
48% 16.7 GB/s
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
60% 66.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 74x |
| FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 50x |
| FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 35x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 14x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |