Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '20 at 11:34
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 248
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 955
85% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,316
82% 1,316 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Zotac(19DA 1511) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 132
Parallax 147
118% 141 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 137
Splatting 107
113% 143 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 260 305 307 307 307 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 488
Mixed 413
SusWrite 316
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 58.7
198% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 359
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
891GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 120 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 176
Write 171
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 119
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
240% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 122 121 123 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
76% Very good
Read 144
Write 144
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 121
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76%
Great: 82%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 128 131 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 103
Write 122
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 129
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
220% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 69%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 156 161 163 163 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 111
Write 135
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 158
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.7
268% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 92%
CENTON 32GB
25GB free, PID 2096
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.2 5.8 5.8 5.4 5.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.9% Terrible
Read 21
Write 4.3
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 5.5
8% 8.38 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.9%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 44.9
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 32.8
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 42.6
SC Mixed 32.3
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 108%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,635 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $428
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback