PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 8.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Asus G74Sx (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK G74Sx |
Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110427 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 20 '20 at 10:36 |
Run Duration | 164 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M
Asus(1043 204B) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 268.37
|
8.34%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 291 280 272 263 260 MB/s
|
86.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
294GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 110 110 112 111 MB/s
|
58.6%
Above average
|
|||
SD Card 8GB
5GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 16 MB/s
|
7.03%
Terrible
|
|||
Verbatim micro USB 8GB
1GB free, PID 023c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 9.1 8.5 10 8.9 9.1 MB/s
|
5.35%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples | 256x |
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples | 206x |
Core i7-2860QMIntel $469Bench 62%, 4,317 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $300 |