Asus P5K-VM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5K-VM  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080807
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '20 at 09:41
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5460-$190
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 68.6
1-Core 45.3
2-Core 86.8
43% 66.9 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 174
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3649) 2GB
CLim: 1437 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 21.6
20% 21.4 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 24.8
Splatting 18.4
19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 85 83 78 81 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 112
Write 106
Mixed 111
SusWrite 81.1
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 23.8
83% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 23.8
DQ Write 71.7
DQ Mixed 31.2
29% 42.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 74 90 68 6 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 152
Write 74.7
Mixed 41
SusWrite 55
59% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 114%
WD WDS2 40G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
65GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 28.5
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 28.4
22% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 6.1
1,121% 6.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
20% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 5.4
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K-VM Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K-VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback