ECS H81H3-M4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	ECS H81H3-M4 (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140513
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '20 at 08:09
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 96.3 2-Core 182 73% 123 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 351 48% 356 Pts	64-Core 353 22% 353 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100 26,726 User benchmarks, average bench 18% XFX(1682 7360) CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.1.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	6.82% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 27.7 Parallax 26.1 0% 18 fps	MRender 24 Gravity 19.6 Splatting 27.8 20% 23.8 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 6.82% Great: 20%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 298GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 107 91 96 105 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 166 Write 165 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 104 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 112%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 149GB free Firmware: 3E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 80 64 76 73 64 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	51% Above average	Read 104 Write 93.7 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 73.9 61% 82.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 9,902 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6545, Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 5.4 4.8 5.4 4.9 5.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	5.26% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 10 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 4.8 12% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.26% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 8GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	55.2% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 17.6 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 16.4 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 66.1 60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81H3-M4 Builds (Compare 985 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H81H3-M4

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	97x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	93x
Core i3-4130Intel $42Bench 52%, 49,509 samples	74x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	176x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	135x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	120x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
SSD 120GBLonglineBench 65%, 271 samples	25x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	24x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	25x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	20x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16