| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1494 |
| Memory | 3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1768 x 992 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150324 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 20 '20 at 06:25 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 22% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.4%
Very good
|
69% 116 Pts
|
48% 381 Pts
|
29% 463 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.20
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
18% 20.2 fps
|
17% 21.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 40 65 25 20 24 MB/s
|
33.7%
Below average
|
43% 58.3 MB/s
|
106% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.6%
Average
|
43% 15.1 GB/s
|
37% 12.9 GB/s
|
58% 69.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,759 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 684x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 590x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 315x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 423x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 137x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 86x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |