Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161019
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 20 '20 at 04:59
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 87.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 226
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 694
67% 550 Pts
64-Core 618
38% 618 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 168
Parallax 163
149% 171 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 177
Splatting 119
129% 163 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 134%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 782 638 627 512 238 225 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 796
Write 724
Mixed 448
SusWrite 503
138% 618 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 39.1
139% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 975
DQ Write 820
DQ Mixed 806
629% 867 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 145%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
41GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 277 276 277 276 266 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 385
Write 396
Mixed 307
SusWrite 287
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 48.5
132% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 229
208% 316 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
3TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 177 177 178 178 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 113
Mixed 76
SusWrite 174
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
WD My Passport 25E2 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 101 101 100 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
42% Average
Read 105
Write 97.5
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 100
123% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.2
62% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 22.5
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,133
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback