| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| Motherboard | Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20160516 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 26 '16 at 04:13 |
| Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.5%
Good
|
60% 101 Pts
|
44% 363 Pts
|
28% 446 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.7.3
|
53%
Above average
|
54% 75.6 fps
|
50% 61.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 9401
|
16.1%
Very poor
|
21% 27.6 MB/s
|
140% 1.35 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
66.1%
Good
|
76% 102 MB/s
|
31% 0.39 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown U3A4G93-16GBHN3B00 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22.7%
Poor
|
20% 7.17 GB/s
|
19% 6.67 GB/s
|
45% 88.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 900 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 430x |
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 112x |
| FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples | 85x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 85x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 66x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 51x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $588 |