PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1494 |
Memory | 11.5 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190412 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 19 '20 at 21:09 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | LCA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
72.3%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
|
31%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS721680PLA380 80GB-$41
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P21OABEA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 40 42 42 43 MB/s
|
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
85GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 121 119 119 119 MB/s
|
70%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
351GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 181 184 181 183 183 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 8GB
7GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 3.6 3.3 3.1 3.1 3.6 MB/s
|
11%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
41.7%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 685x |
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 592x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 315x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 423x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 137x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 86x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |