Asrock H61M-HG4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H61M-HG4 (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130711
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '20 at 20:52
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 87 2-Core 169 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 238 32% 242 Pts	64-Core 288 18% 288 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 8586) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22.9% Poor	Lighting 28 Reflection 27.6 Parallax 25 23% 26.9 fps	MRender 33.8 Gravity 25.3 Splatting 26.1 23% 28.4 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 91 89 90 87 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 81 Write 80 Mixed 46 SusWrite 87.6 54% 73.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 70%
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37 7,072 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 298GB free Firmware: AM001J SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 97 97 97 97 95 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 96 Write 91.8 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 95.8 58% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR5030EF68F9W1600 8GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	46.4% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 13.5 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-HG4 Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HG4

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	35x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	18x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	15x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	17x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 16,567 samples	7x
KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX316C10/8 16GBKingstonBench 42%, 6 samples	6x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16