Lenovo 20324

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Lenovo 20324 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO IdeaPad Flex10
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150624
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '20 at 20:17
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2807 814 User benchmarks, average bench 31% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	32.8% Below average	Memory 61 1-Core 18.3 2-Core 15.6 26% 31.6 Pts	4-Core 28.6 8-Core 34.3 4% 31.5 Pts	64-Core 33.4 2% 33.4 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3985) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.77% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.88 1% 0.89 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.35 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.77% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 165 208 206 202 220 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.7% Above average	Read 238 Write 230 Mixed 223 SusWrite 199 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 28.2 91% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 79.1 DQ Write 75.9 DQ Mixed 78 58% 77.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 124%
Adata DashDrive Elite S102 Pro USB 3.0 32GB-$11 1,777 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 27GB free, PID 312b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 31 31 31 32 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	24% Poor	Read 97.7 Write 32.7 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 30.8 50% 45.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.1 77% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 5.5 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 2.4 8% 2.73 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 20324 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 14%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20324

CPU
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	5x
Celeron N2807IntelBench 31%, 814 samples	4x
Celeron N2806IntelBench 28%, 448 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	17x

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	1x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
1x2GBMicronBench 14%, 979 samples	6x
M471B5174BM0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 16%, 65 samples	6x
1x4GBMicronBench 22%, 5,693 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $25

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 20324

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Lenovo 20324

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)