Toshiba SATELLITE C855-1Z1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C855-1Z1  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel PLCSF8
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120924
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJan 19 '20 at 18:18
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B960
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Memory 34.7
1-Core 18.8
2-Core 63.4
23% 39 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 114
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 113
7% 113 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FB30) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 0.85
Parallax 0.59
0% 0.69 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.91 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 32 25 28 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 35
Write 30.7
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 30
22% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.6% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.1
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 229
18% 229 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback