Asrock FM2A75 Pro4+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75 Pro4+  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131030
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 19 '20 at 18:04
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 132
58% 95 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 215
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
ASRock(1849 9901) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 6.83
Reflection 7.77
Parallax 7.09
6% 7.23 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 6.33
Splatting 7.22
5% 5.98 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 135 165 161 163 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 419
Write 362
Mixed 310
SusWrite 178
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 31.6
116% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 172
140% 200 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
416GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 155 155 155 155 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 117
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 153
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 750GB
159GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 100
Write 94.5
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 72.2
98% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 42%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 64GB
28GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.3 3.8 4.2 4.3 4.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
6.75% Terrible
Read 33.2
Write 4
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 3.8
11% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
31% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.75%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.7% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10.1
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75 Pro4+ Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback