| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | Dell Precision T3600 |
| Motherboard | Dell Precision T3600 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190625 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 19 '20 at 17:09 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
64.6%
Good
|
61% 101 Pts
|
37% 280 Pts
|
18% 289 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30%
Below average
|
30% 34.2 fps
|
30% 36.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 380 429 443 437 440 MB/s
|
96%
Outstanding
|
87% 388 MB/s
|
119% 40.9 MB/s
|
192% 306 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung-00CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.8%
Average
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
52% 77.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,853 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 1,062x |
| Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 446x |
| Xeon E5-1603 0IntelBench 60%, 3,589 samples | 237x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 162x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 138x |
| Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 117x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |