PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z390 Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190812 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Jan 19 '20 at 17:09 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600K-$164
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
|
98.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
|
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 109 137 142 140 142 MB/s
|
69%
Good
|
|||
Seagate ST3120026AS 120GB-$24
86GB free
Firmware: 3.42
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 57 57 57 57 MB/s
|
32.5%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
36GB free
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 59 59 59 59 MB/s
|
31.3%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate BUP Slim 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 127 127 126 127 MB/s
|
60.3%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9600KIntel $164Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 1,176x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $275Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 1,104x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $459Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 515x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $442Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 374x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 330x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 307x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $911 |