Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190909
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '20 at 11:51
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	74%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 75.2 1-Core 150 2-Core 281 91% 169 Pts	4-Core 529 8-Core 909 87% 719 Pts	64-Core 1396 86% 1396 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6183) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 133 Reflection 150 Parallax 137 109% 140 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 131 Splatting 112 97% 120 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 179 90 74 58 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 196 Mixed 358 SusWrite 138 65% 294 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 54.2 179% 61.3 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 199 150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 336GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 85 85 85 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 79.5 Write 81 Mixed 63 SusWrite 84 57% 76.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 144 153 154 153 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 135 Write 123 Mixed 77 SusWrite 149 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42 105,447 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.9% Good	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 28.1 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 23.7 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 90 44% 90 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,640x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,409x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,234x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,072x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,466x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,834x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	865x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $932

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16