Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	21.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '20 at 09:26
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9370-$194 9,054 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	67% Good	Memory 85.3 1-Core 76.6 2-Core 142 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 477 44% 370 Pts	64-Core 469 29% 469 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 5.04 Parallax 3.44 4% 4.25 fps	MRender 5.81 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.09 4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 480GB-$42 17,946 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 406GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900913 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 199 208 221 223 213 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 288 Write 302 Mixed 216 SusWrite 216 58% 256 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 72.3 4K Mixed 29.5 122% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 157 140% 209 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 13GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 77 83 84 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 48.6 Write 64.5 Mixed 56 SusWrite 78.7 46% 62 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 30% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 90%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB 6,021 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 28GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 19.2 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 18.6 28% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 2.2 177% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18JSF51272AZ-1G1D1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX 18JSF51272AZ-1G1D1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX 24GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	40.1% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 13.3 40% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 11.7 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16