| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Performance (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160113 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 19 '20 at 08:54 |
| Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.2%
Above average
|
57% 91 Pts
|
28% 234 Pts
|
18% 288 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.1.1
|
20.2%
Poor
|
19% 28 fps
|
22% 26.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 846 964 875 817 820 819 MB/s
|
151%
Outstanding
|
207% 917 MB/s
|
156% 50.3 MB/s
|
200% 266 MB/s
|
|
|
90% 404 MB/s
|
160% 54.2 MB/s
|
190% 257 MB/s
| |
|
|
112% 153 MB/s
|
172% 1.13 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.1%
Poor
|
23% 8.13 GB/s
|
22% 7.73 GB/s
|
55% 73 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Performance Builds (Compare 57 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 20x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 15x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 12x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| R7 370AMD $153Bench 21%, 39,178 samples | 3x |
| HD 7870AMD $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples | 3x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $311 |