| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Intel X79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161013 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 19 '20 at 02:48 |
| Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
| Run User | NZL-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57%
Above average
|
46% 71.9 Pts
|
36% 295 Pts
|
27% 440 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
|
30.9%
Below average
|
31% 35.3 fps
|
30% 36.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 256 253 251 260 257 MB/s
|
82%
Excellent
|
84% 376 MB/s
|
110% 35.9 MB/s
|
188% 272 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
119GB free
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 291 289 291 291 289 MB/s
|
70.4%
Very good
|
69% 308 MB/s
|
77% 26.1 MB/s
|
126% 209 MB/s
|
|
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1TB
931GB free, PID 5021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
|
13.6%
Very poor
|
38% 28.5 MB/s
|
46% 0.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.6%
Average
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
25% 8.73 GB/s
|
42% 94.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,977 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel X79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 339x |
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 268x |
| Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples | 143x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 126x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 114x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 108x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $158 |