Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190717
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '20 at 01:44
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Memory 93.3 1-Core 123 2-Core 245 87% 154 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 561 65% 506 Pts	64-Core 466 29% 466 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Lighting 74.8 Reflection 68.9 Parallax 89.3 61% 77.7 fps	MRender 71.2 Gravity 71.2 Splatting 58.5 54% 67 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB 15,567 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 95 81 79 78 80 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Read 471 Write 359 Mixed 336 SusWrite 122 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 68.1 4K Mixed 34.6 132% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 186 168% 254 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 88%
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB 9,720 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 466GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 91 90 90 90 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 86.2 Write 91 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 90.2 59% 80.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown MD401GNSE-CB3M2 1x8GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	41.9% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 11.6 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 13 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 61.5 65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	544x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	223x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	117x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	134x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	115x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	90x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	161x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	69x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	57x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	96x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	69x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $263

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16