| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock AB350M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181220 |
| Uptime | 1.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 19 '20 at 00:06 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 42% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.2%
Good
|
65% 116 Pts
|
43% 337 Pts
|
19% 310 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1386 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
|
56.8%
Above average
|
58% 81 fps
|
54% 67.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 353 357 358 358 353 MB/s
|
111%
Outstanding
|
97% 430 MB/s
|
174% 61.3 MB/s
|
272% 363 MB/s
|
|
WD WD1000FYPS-01ZKB0 1TB
49GB free
Firmware: 02.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 37 38 39 37 MB/s
|
27.3%
Poor
|
35% 48.1 MB/s
|
142% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
802GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 165 181 183 184 185 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
97% 135 MB/s
|
176% 1.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown? CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
68.6%
Good
|
71% 25 GB/s
|
57% 19.8 GB/s
|
39% 104 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,411 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $88
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 296x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 125x |
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 102x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 144x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 120x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 96x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $458 |