Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	Memory 41.6 1-Core 16.8 2-Core 35.7 22% 31.4 Pts	4-Core 35.9 8-Core 38.9 5% 37.4 Pts	64-Core 38 2% 38 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 9082) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.91% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.38 1% 1.31 fps	MRender 1.38 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.52 1% 1.18 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.91% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: X31200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 173 177 186 188 191 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.5% Below average	Read 261 Write 258 Mixed 170 SusWrite 185 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 11.5 4K Mixed 9.6 30% 9.57 MB/s	DQ Read 82.1 DQ Write 68 DQ Mixed 72.6 55% 74.2 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 101%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 25GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.2 3.7 2.6 5.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	5.08% Terrible	Read 14.8 Write 4.5 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 3.9 8% 6.85 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1 58% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.08% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 1x2GB 2,805 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1334 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.57% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 1.7 8% 2.73 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 0.4 5% 1.83 GB/s	Latency 195 20% 195 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.57% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16