Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '20 at 17:22
Run Duration	443 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	32%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	55% Above average	Memory 66.5 1-Core 67 2-Core 122 51% 85.3 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 374 37% 304 Pts	64-Core 506 31% 506 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 04A8) CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.5% Average	Lighting 58 Reflection 65.5 Parallax 74.4 47% 66 fps	MRender 66.4 Gravity 56.3 Splatting 55 48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 288GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 828 608 596 600 598 565 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	180% Outstanding	Read 1,838 Write 1,680 Mixed 704 SusWrite 632 270% 1,214 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 71.4 4K Mixed 45.1 158% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 545 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 444 327% 436 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 254%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$140 14,258 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 11GB free Firmware: LF1i Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 278 Write 201 Mixed 250 54% 243 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 56.8 4K Mixed 30.6 116% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 299 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 219 173% 242 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 88%
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 34GB free Firmware: 2CV102HA SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 77 82 82 79 83 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Read 251 Write 83.3 Mixed 116 SusWrite 80.6 29% 133 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 11.5 74% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 80.4 DQ Mixed 80.2 69% 104 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 44%
WL2500GSA6454G 2.5TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 899GB free Firmware: 01.01K01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 41 38 43 40 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 167 Write 42.7 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 40.8 52% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 84%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 817GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 140 141 142 141 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 166 Write 150 Mixed 102 SusWrite 141 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 100%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 279GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 92 92 92 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 97.2 Write 104 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 92.7 57% 79.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 75%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 317GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 85 88 89 86 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 87 Write 88.7 Mixed 59.2 SusWrite 87.1 59% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 51%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 297GB free Firmware: 2BA30003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 78 78 79 79 79 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 88.5 Write 60.3 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 77.7 51% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 59%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB 883 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1TB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 175 178 177 176 176 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 160 Write 146 Mixed 77 SusWrite 175 186% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 73%
WDC WD20 EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1.5TB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 40.5 Write 36 Mixed 33.2 SusWrite 21.2 43% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 19%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB 2,310 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 50GB free, PID 5595 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 25 26 23 23 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 152 Write 50 Mixed 67 SusWrite 36.6 87% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.5 118% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 40%
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB 1,396 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1.5TB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 27.5 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 21.5 38% 29 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 21%
Intenso Rainbow Line 32GB 449 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 13GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 0.7 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 0.6 1% 0.58 MB/s	4K Read 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Disk Name 960GB 893GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 35 35 34 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	63.1% Good	Read 38.3 Write 33.5 Mixed 35.3 SusWrite 34.4 48% 35.4 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 12.6 994% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 11.7 DQ Write 17.5 DQ Mixed 13.9 1,111% 14.4 MB/s

Disk Name 128GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 55GB free, PID 2509 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 37 Write 36.8 Mixed 35.2 SusWrite 36.2 50% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 15.7 4K Mixed 10.1 911% 11.6 MB/s	DQ Read 9.7 DQ Write 17.2 DQ Mixed 11.4 1,009% 12.8 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42 131,007 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 26.2 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 25.7 SC Mixed 19.9 59% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)