| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Asus CG8250 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK CG8250 |
| Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120313 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 18 '20 at 16:54 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.9%
Very good
|
67% 111 Pts
|
41% 308 Pts
|
19% 313 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1361 MHz, MLim: 1569 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
|
29.9%
Poor
|
28% 37.9 fps
|
33% 40.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 109 51 51 51 50 MB/s
|
54.7%
Above average
|
58% 260 MB/s
|
106% 35.6 MB/s
|
40% 57.8 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.8%
Average
|
49% 17.2 GB/s
|
40% 14 GB/s
|
59% 68 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CG8250 Builds (Compare 135 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus CG8250
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 84x |
| Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples | 18x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 14x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 17x |
| GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples | 16x |
| GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 33% - Below average | Total price: $535 |