To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '20 at 16:27
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 673
61% 515 Pts
64-Core 891
55% 891 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Lighting 72.4
Reflection 73.4
Parallax 63.8
59% 69.9 fps
MRender 75.2
Gravity 70
Splatting 70.2
59% 71.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 360GB 360GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R083
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 217 41 164 41 134 MB/s
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.2% Above average
Read 254
Write 231
Mixed 231
SusWrite 136
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 19.8
93% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 19
58% 124 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 84%
Hitachi HTS723232L9A360 320GB
214GB free
Firmware: FC4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 70.8
Write 68
Mixed 39
SusWrite 70.6
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 45%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
118GB free, PID 2321
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 27.5
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 28
38% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 20.5
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback