Fujitsu FMVNQ7PE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu FMVNQ7PE  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB24B
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141110
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 18 '20 at 01:30
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3427U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Memory 58
1-Core 35.4
2-Core 52.7
33% 48.7 Pts
4-Core 58.4
8-Core 77.6
9% 68 Pts
64-Core 90.4
6% 90.4 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 16C1) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.4% Terrible
Lighting 1.53
Reflection 1.92
Parallax 1.19
1% 1.55 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 2.78
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.4%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE128HMGR-00007 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT4206Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 130 129 133 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 345
Write 134
Mixed 148
SusWrite 129
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 13.9
54% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 59.2
66% 113 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
22.2% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.9
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback