Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics95.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJan 18 '20 at 00:30
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 236
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 503
68% 509 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 4011) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.7% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 111
Parallax 118
93% 114 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 116
Splatting 96.3
101% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
112GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 325 357 357 359 357 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 384
Write 349
Mixed 246
SusWrite 336
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 14.4
124% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 88
108% 185 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 86%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 895 838 834 837 821 826 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,479
Write 1,653
Mixed 1,395
SusWrite 842
354% 1,592 MB/s
4K Read 70.7
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 97.4
326% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,595
DQ Write 1,406
DQ Mixed 1,490
1,120% 1,497 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 319%
Great: 355%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
894GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 84 85 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 88.5
Write 82.5
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 83.4
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2800 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 24.1
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 25.1
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $701
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback