Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3060 20,242 User benchmarks, average bench 18% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	24.2% Poor	Memory 40.6 1-Core 24.2 2-Core 48.7 24% 37.8 Pts	4-Core 46.7 8-Core 49.1 6% 47.9 Pts	64-Core 45.4 3% 45.4 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 832C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.44% Terrible	Lighting 1.47 Reflection 1.85 Parallax 2.28 1% 1.86 fps	MRender 1.95 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 3.04 2% 2.22 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.44% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GB 8,741 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6103006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 106 107 106 107 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 390 Write 356 Mixed 258 SusWrite 112 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 24.2 89% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 98.6 DQ Write 69 DQ Mixed 75 58% 80.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KBGH/4G 1x4GB 5,684 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	14.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 4.4 15% 5.17 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 2.5 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 199 20% 199 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,228x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	415x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	69x

SSD
SD9SN8W-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 76%, 2,721 samples	146x
SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 70%, 12,432 samples	113x
MZNLN256HAJQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 4,927 samples	90x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	119x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	110x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	109x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16