HP EliteBook 8560w

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	HP EliteBook 8560w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1631
Memory	12.3 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110725
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '20 at 21:23
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	56%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85 7,798 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 79 1-Core 58.1 2-Core 105 51% 80.8 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 262 27% 218 Pts	64-Core 278 17% 278 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M 6,108 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 1631) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.53% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 4.96 Parallax 3.5 4% 4.25 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 3.09 4% 4.56 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.53% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF2204RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 93 94 132 132 138 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 370 Write 300 Mixed 134 SusWrite 137 52% 236 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 10.2 32% 9.6 MB/s	DQ Read 96.8 DQ Write 78.3 DQ Mixed 28.9 38% 68 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 56%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5 Write 2.7 Mixed 1.3 3% 3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 14GB 9,406 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 4096, 2048, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 7.4 22% 7.87 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 7.2 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 82.4 48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8560w Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8560w

CPU
Core i7-2820QMIntel $230Bench 59%, 4,929 samples	91x
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	77x
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	64x

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	287x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	126x
FirePro M5950 AMDBench 5%, 1,394 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	189x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	63x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16