Asus P7P55-M

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55-M (all builds)
Memory	0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100624
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '20 at 19:34
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 97 1-Core 77.1 2-Core 137 65% 104 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 222 32% 234 Pts	64-Core 213 13% 213 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 3623) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.03% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 2.85 Parallax 1.22 2% 2.19 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 2.22 2% 2.51 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.03% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 74 72 63 64 31 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.4% Below average	Read 71.2 Write 178 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 70.2 22% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 44 4K Mixed 24.1 69% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 153 124% 174 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 85%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 18GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 82 94 86 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 101 Write 58 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 89.2 57% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR 1333 MHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 7.3 22% 7.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.7 18% 6.3 GB/s	Latency 50.4 79% 50.4 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55-M Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7P55-M

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	65x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	52x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	39x

GPU
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	19x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	10x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	87x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	69x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16