Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110714
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '20 at 19:08
Run Duration	77 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 83.8 2-Core 157 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 290 39% 291 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2400-XT 1,881 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 0D02) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.880.0.0 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	0.75% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.96 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.11 fps	MRender 1.14 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 1.52 1% 0.94 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.75% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:83 8A Princeton 40GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.1% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 7.7 22% 7.87 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 8.8 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 61 66% 61 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	285x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	65x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	56x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	13x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 44GBUnknownBench 30%, 232 samples	13x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16