Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) 5,170 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Memory 45.2 1-Core 26.9 2-Core 52.8 27% 41.6 Pts	4-Core 97.7 8-Core 99.3 13% 98.5 Pts	64-Core 102 6% 102 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 4,472 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 82F6) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 1.97 Reflection 3.38 Parallax 2.69 2% 2.68 fps	MRender 2.52 Gravity 1.93 Splatting 2.74 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 100 32 117 25 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 331 Write 279 Mixed 291 SusWrite 80.4 55% 245 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 31.8 4K Mixed 17.8 72% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 27.2 DQ Mixed 21 30% 57.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Micron 8JTF25664HZ-1G4M1 6GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.6% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 6 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 5.7 13% 4.57 GB/s	Latency 179 22% 179 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 36%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 4,472 samples	40x
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	26x
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	6x

SSD
MZNLN256HMHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 91%, 5,596 samples	7x
SD8SNAT-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 66%, 2,836 samples	3x
MZNLF128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 46%, 3,641 samples	2x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 1x4GBMicronBench 19%, 3,980 samples	11x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	8x
AM1L16BC8R2-B1XS 1x8GBAdataBench 22%, 2,239 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16