Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '20 at 10:16
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 189
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 562
54% 445 Pts
64-Core 765
47% 765 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.5% Very good
Lighting 99.4
Reflection 104
Parallax 94.1
81% 99.1 fps
MRender 86.3
Gravity 90.5
Splatting 83.3
71% 86.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
164GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 397 388 413 365 312 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 461
Mixed 445
SusWrite 379
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 51
169% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 350
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
192GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 376 380 411 435 436 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 466
Mixed 446
SusWrite 404
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 51
170% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 350
263% 351 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 476
Write 402
Mixed 274
85% 384 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 45.9
162% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 169
177% 291 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
155GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 396 390 214 62 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 463
Mixed 380
SusWrite 250
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 50.7
167% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 262
221% 322 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 102%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 31.5
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 18.9
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,981 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $748
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback