Asus F1A75-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '20 at 07:49
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3850 APU-$80
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 46.4
2-Core 92.6
48% 73.7 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 178
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
Asus(1043 0403) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Lighting 6.93
Reflection 6.88
Parallax 5.78
6% 6.53 fps
MRender 6.05
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 6
5% 5.75 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$30
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 288 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 419
Write 278
Mixed 305
SusWrite 147
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 19.8
75% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 156
134% 197 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
62GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 68 69 69 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 86
Write 75.3
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 67.9
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$109
144GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 89 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 83.3
Write 73
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 87.7
53% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 76%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
245GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 120 118 120 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 125
Write 123
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 119
69% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 108%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
2GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 90.5
Write 43.8
Mixed 7.3
47% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
42% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.1% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 11
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-V PRO Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V PRO - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $213
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback