HP Z440 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Z440 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 212B
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '20 at 06:36
Run Duration	292 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 1,907 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	78.4% Very good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 109 2-Core 220 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 548 56% 451 Pts	64-Core 552 34% 552 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% EVGA(3842 3776) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Lighting 43.9 Reflection 40.8 Parallax 53.8 36% 46.2 fps	MRender 55.9 Gravity 51.1 Splatting 38.3 39% 48.4 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 21,542 User benchmarks, average bench 238% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXA73H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 718 941 950 936 867 846 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	196% Outstanding	Read 1838 Write 1,048 Mixed 563 SusWrite 876 239% 1,081 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 39.9 132% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 632 DQ Write 624 DQ Mixed 631 473% 629 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 196% Great: 306%
Fusion-io ioCache 600GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 99GB free SusWrite @10s intervals: 579 733 752 783 749 745 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 31% Great: 34%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 33GB free Firmware: BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 268 98 77 53 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Read 487 Write 463 Mixed 407 SusWrite 146 84% 376 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 69.6 4K Mixed 46.3 150% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 248 215% 319 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 126%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 491GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 148 149 149 150 151 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 86.5 Write 87.5 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 149 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 109%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 15GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	7.21% Terrible	Read 21.3 Write 13.3 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 13.5 18% 14.1 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 7.21% Great: 8%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 24GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 43 36 14 15 13 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 151 Write 45.5 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 25.5 77% 70.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.7 158% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 38%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB 12,134 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 25GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 115 Write 28 Mixed 34.7 SusWrite 25.7 54% 50.8 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 11.4 4K Mixed 11.3 818% 11.7 MB/s	DQ Read 16.9 DQ Write 12.8 DQ Mixed 13.4 954% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 86%
SanDisk Cruzer 16GB 5,058 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 10GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3.1 4 4.4 4.4 4.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	6.97% Terrible	Read 21 Write 14 Mixed 12 SusWrite 3.8 15% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.2 79% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.97% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 2x8GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	61.1% Good	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 20 61% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 18 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z440 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: HP Z440 Workstation

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	1,239x
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples	1,036x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	861x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	740x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	376x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	223x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	144x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	129x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	184x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	177x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	157x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16