Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151023
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 17 '20 at 04:28
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6700-$299
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
21.8% Poor
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 39.7
15% 31.7 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 424
34% 287 Pts
64-Core 526
35% 526 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$140
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Lighting 66
Reflection 91
Parallax 140
17% 99 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 82.3
Splatting 117
28% 112 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 57%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$51
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 247 264 276 272 274 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 341
Write 311
Mixed 258
SusWrite 265
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 21.6
58% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 351
264% 352 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 197 203 207 212 209 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 185
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 201
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%
WD Elements 1.5TB
276GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 37 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 34.7
Write 35.2
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 36.8
46% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 22%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
401GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 119 124 123 123 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
49% Average
Read 113
Write 113
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 120
144% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.16FA11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.7
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 78%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 10,141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $488
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback