HP Compaq Elite 8200 CMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8200 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '20 at 21:27
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 162
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 330
44% 332 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 38
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 35.3
31% 34.2 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 34.7
29% 36 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blast 240GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 112 69 60 89 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 349
Write 315
Mixed 246
SusWrite 105
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 25.9
89% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 80.6
DQ Mixed 37
34% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
92GB free
Firmware: 3.ADA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 45 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
30% Below average
Read 60.2
Write 60.3
Mixed 36
SusWrite 44.2
37% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30%
Great: 42%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
25GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 19 15 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
8.75% Terrible
Read 24.2
Write 10.3
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 18.2
16% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.75%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.6% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback