Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 1,265 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 72 2-Core 143 60% 99.4 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 524 52% 422 Pts	64-Core 1,222 76% 1,222 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.94 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Lighting 15.1 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 18.8 12% 16.1 fps	MRender 21.1 Gravity 18.4 Splatting 16.8 15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 13%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI MR9271-8i 256GB 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.27 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 2,761 Write 2,977 Mixed 2954 649% 2,897 MB/s	4K Read 67.8 4K Write 44.5 4K Mixed 45 184% 52.4 MB/s	DQ Read 301 DQ Write 305 DQ Mixed 296 224% 301 MB/s

LSI MR9271-8i 5TB 2TB free Firmware: 3.27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 135 135 135 134 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD 4x16GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (54^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	88.8% Excellent	MC Read 44.4 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 33.5 103% 35.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.2 24% 8.33 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples	66x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v21stBench 73%, 400 samples	48x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	47x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	79x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	38x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	26x

RAM
HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GBHynixBench 82%, 1,002 samples	36x
9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 82%, 908 samples	28x
18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 4x8GBMicronBench 77%, 512 samples	28x

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $109

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16