To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180629
Uptime	6.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '20 at 20:40
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	DZA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 84 1-Core 91.9 2-Core 182 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 365 46% 352 Pts	64-Core 357 22% 357 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3287) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.4% Above average	Lighting 65.6 Reflection 64.5 Parallax 57.8 54% 62.6 fps	MRender 69.6 Gravity 63 Splatting 63.7 53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS725050KLA360 500GB-$40 5,497 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: K2AOA60A SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 35 35 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 31.2 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 33.6 23% 31.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 34%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 59GB free Firmware: GG2OAC90 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 36 44 41 50 51 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 98.5 Write 62.5 Mixed 32 SusWrite 42.4 43% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 58%
Excelstor Technology J8160S 160GB 1,310 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 103GB free Firmware: P22OABEA SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 68 68 67 66 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 65 Write 66.2 Mixed 40 SusWrite 66.8 44% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG 8313 CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 6GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.5% Average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 12.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 13.1 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	707x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	614x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	102x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16