Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	11.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Toshiba Qosmio X75-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	17.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140418
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '20 at 18:41
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Memory 87.3 1-Core 94.4 2-Core 182 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 73.9 8-Core 136 13% 105 Pts	64-Core 424 26% 424 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M 6,357 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Toshiba(1179 FA77) 3GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Lighting 20.5 Reflection 18.4 Parallax 23.3 17% 20.7 fps	MRender 23.6 Gravity 23.9 Splatting 19.2 18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB 17,192 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 602GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0813A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 428 131 18 17 17 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11.1% Very poor	Read 9.7 Write 8.2 Mixed 12 SusWrite 172 12% 50.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.2 1% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 101%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB 11,708 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 539GB free Firmware: JB0OA3U0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 117 119 121 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 119 Write 112 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 118 68% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 24GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	49.7% Average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 15.5 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 15.7 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Qosmio X75-A Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	72x
Core i7-4910MQIntel $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples	3x
Core i7-4702MQIntelBench 61%, 21,618 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	47x
GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples	30x

SSD
HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GBToshiba $167Bench 71%, 1,242 samples	29x
Solid State Disk 1TBSpccBench 79%, 17,192 samples	3x
M4 256GBCrucial $218Bench 61%, 17,938 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,045 samples	15x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,523 samples	8x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,054 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16