Acer Predator PO3-600

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Predator PO3-600 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator PO3-600
Memory	24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190329
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '20 at 18:24
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	91%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 73.6 1-Core 120 2-Core 188 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 702 72% 578 Pts	64-Core 662 41% 662 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Sapphire(174B 2438) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	4.69% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 15.2 Parallax 4.94 4% 8.49 fps	MRender 7.1 Gravity 4.47 Splatting 7.78 5% 6.45 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 4.69% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSC180DS37128GH 128GB 216 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK10D7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 54 34 52 47 29 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.9% Poor	Read 79.5 Write 230 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 50 22% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 26.2 4K Mixed 7.4 39% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 95.4 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 170 114% 134 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 80%
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB 6,924 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 886GB free Firmware: 17.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 137 140 129 165 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 427 Write 107 Mixed 128 SusWrite 142 44% 201 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 9 4K Mixed 13.6 42% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 325 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 217 164% 226 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$160 110,884 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	69.5% Good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 23.5 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 93.3 43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PO3-600 Builds (Compare 2,605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 78%

Battleship

System: Acer Predator PO3-600

CPU
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	887x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	693x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	572x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	481x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	439x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	386x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	505x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	321x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	166x

RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples	491x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	308x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 1,446 samples	194x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $584

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16