Acer AcerPower FH

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer AcerPower FH (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer E946GZ
Memory	0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070523
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '20 at 16:53
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4600 6,872 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	34% Below average	Memory 59.4 1-Core 27.3 2-Core 52.4 32% 46.4 Pts	4-Core 53.3 8-Core 52.3 7% 52.8 Pts	64-Core 53.1 3% 53.1 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% PwrHis(1787 2320) 1GB CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.12.2 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	20% Poor	Lighting 23.6 Reflection 27.7 Parallax 29.8 19% 27 fps	MRender 23.6 Gravity 21 Splatting 31.9 22% 25.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMBB.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 42 45 44 52 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.4% Average	Read 232 Write 207 Mixed 202 SusWrite 43.2 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 36 4K Mixed 25.4 84% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 29.9 DQ Write 64.6 DQ Mixed 37.6 31% 44 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 95%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 48GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 32 21 29 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 36.3 Write 36 Mixed 29 SusWrite 30.6 24% 33 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 59%
Hitachi HTS543232L9SA00 320GB 1,142 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 75GB free Firmware: FB4OC43C SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 48 48 48 48 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 50 Write 49.7 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 47.4 32% 44 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 34%
WD WD800BB-88JHC0 80GB 2,880 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 51GB free Firmware: 05.01C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 44 50 51 51 52 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 53.8 Write 53.3 Mixed 36.3 SusWrite 49.8 36% 48.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 166% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 31%
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25 4,646 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 41GB free Firmware: ZH100-47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 36 29 18 26 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 16.7 Write 28.8 Mixed 16 SusWrite 27.6 16% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 40% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 2.5 11% 3.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 1.8 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Acer AcerPower FH

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)